Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Philology. Journalism

ISSN 1817-7115 (Print)
ISSN 2541-898X (Online)


For citation:

Mikhailin V. Y. Cypress by a cave: Erotic frustration, agon and death in Theocritus’ Idyll XI. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 57-66. DOI: 10.18500/1817-7115-2025-25-1-57-66, EDN: KCBFXJ

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text PDF(Ru):
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
821.14’01.09-1+929Феокрит
EDN: 
KCBFXJ

Cypress by a cave: Erotic frustration, agon and death in Theocritus’ Idyll XI

Autors: 
Mikhailin Vadim Yurievich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The author offers a possible explanation of a stable thematic complex including the themes of erotic frustration, agon and death as a constitutive for idyllic genre. The choice of Theocritus’ Idyll XI for the analysis is motivated by its undoubtedly intimate character (along with Idylls VII, XIII and XXVIII), which makes them part of some specific personalized contexts: the people mentioned were Theocritus’ colleagues along with being his friends. So there are some extra characteristics for the meta position offered here to the audience – as it supposes on its part not only a certain level of erudition together with the skills enabling the reader to operate concurrently with essentially different culture codes but also professional skills of a poet accustomed with the know-how of the poetic process of the early Hellenistic ars poetica. The author pays special attention to ekphrasa and ekphrastic techniques as one of the most characteristic elements of Alexandrian poetry, as well as to the allusions to Homer’s Odyssey as a precedent text not only for this particular piece, but for the whole book. Other poems from the same book are applied to as a comparative material both for thematic and poetics reasons. Also the possible personal references are discussed as forming the intimate context crucial for understanding Theocritus.

Reference: 
  1. Panofsky E. Et in Arcadia ego: On the Conception of Transience in Poussin and Watteau // Philosophy and History. Essays Presented to Ernst Cassirer / ed. by R. Klibansky, H. J. Patton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936. P. 223–254.

  2. Panofsky E. Et in Arcadia ego: Poussin and the Elegiac Tradition // Meaning in the Visual Arts. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1955. P. 295–320.

  3. Congleton J. E. Theories of Pastoral Poetry in England 1684–1798. Gainesville: Haskell, 1952. 355 p.

  4. Halperin D. Before Pastoral. Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1983. 290 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt211qx2w

  5. Payne M. Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge (Mass.): Cambridge University Press, 2007. 183 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483059

  6. Михайлин В., Иванова Д. Два пастуха разглядывают кубок. Феокрит и рождение современной литературной традиции // Агрессия. Интерпретация культурных кодов: 2010 / сост. и общ. ред.: В. Ю. Михайлин, Е. С. Решетникова. Саратов; СПб.: ЛИСКА, 2010. С. 141–161. EDN: YOEQQF

  7. Kossaifi Ch. Et in Theocrito ego… Death in Theocritus’ Bucolic Idylls // Mnemosyne. 2017. № 70. P. 40–57.

  8. Väänänen K. Warrior and Pastoral Duels in Homer, Theocritus, and Vergil. Athènes (Geor.): University of Georgia, 2010. URL: https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/vaananen_katrina_201008_ma.pdf (дата обращения: 20.06.2024).

  9. Даррелл Л. Жюстин. СПб.: Symposium, 2003. 304 с.

  10. Михайлин В. Древнегреческая симпосиастическая культура и проблема происхождения афинского театра // Литература и театр: проблема диалога: сб. ст. / отв. ред. и сост. Л. Г. Тютелова. Самара: ООО «Офорт», 2011. С. 250–265. EDN: UAJIPH

  11. Theocritus: in 2 vols. / edited with a translation and commentary by A. S. F. Gow. Vol. 2. Commentary, Appendix, Indexes, and Plates. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1952. 638 p.

  12. Theocritus: in 2 vols. / edited with a translation and commentary by A. S. F. Gow. Vol. 1. Introduction, Text, and Translation. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1952. 257 p.

  13. Феокрит, Мосх, Бион. Идиллии и эпиграммы / пер. и коммент. М. Е. Грабарь-Пассек. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1958. 326 с. (Литературные памятники).

  14. LeVen P. A. The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Lyric Poetry. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 377 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139088145

  15. Sistakou E. Tragic Failures: Alexandrian Responses to Tragedy and the Tragic. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2016. 261 p. (Trends in Classics. Supplementary volumes, 38). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110482324

  16. Михайлин В. Дионисова борода: визуальная организация поведенческих практик в древнегреческой пиршественной культуре. Саратов: ЛИСКА, 2007. 33 с. (Труды семинара ПМАК. Вып. 13). EDN: YKVCUU

  17. Segal Ch. Death by Water: A Narrative Pattern in Theocritus (Idylls 1, 13, 22, 23) // Hermes. 1974. Bd. 102, H. 1. S. 20–38.

  18. Sbardella L. Philitas of Cos // Brill’s New Pauly. Antiquity. Vol. 11 (Phi–Prok) / ed. by H. Cancik, H. Schneider, C. F. Salazar, D. Orton. Leiden: Brill, 2007. P. 49–50.

  19. Solomon S., Greenberg J., Pyszczinsky T. A Terror Management Theory of Social Behaviour: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 24 / ed. by P. M. Zanna. Academic Press, 1991. P. 93–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60328-7

  20. Михайлин В., Беляева Г. «Вы жертвою пали»: феномен присвоения смерти в советской традиции // Отечественные записки. 2013. № 5 (56). С. 294‒310. EDN: RWIQGP

  21. Frontisi-Ducroux F. Du Masque au visage. Aspects de l’identité en Grèce ancienne. Paris: Flammarion, 1995. 192 p.

Received: 
23.07.2024
Accepted: 
14.11.2024
Available online: 
28.02.2025
Published: 
28.02.2025