review

Nowadays literary criticism on the Internet is actively developing, becoming an area of influence on the worldview of the modern reader. The article provides a comparative analysis of literary and critical publications on the Internet and in literary and art journals on poetic texts in the period from 2020 to 2023.

The article is dedicated to the book:

Клоков В. Т. Французский язык во Франции. Особенности социально-территориальной вариативности. – Саратов : Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 2011. – 424 с. – (Территориальные варианты романских языков).

The article is dedicated to the books about Solzhenitsyn.

A. N. Pypin helped many beginning writers to identify their path. B. B. Glinsky was among them. Significant biographical facts related to the history of the writers’ relationships are revealed in understudied printed sources and archive materials introduced into the scientific circulation for the first time.

The article belongs to a series of articles entitled «The portrait of N.A. Polevoy in literary memoirs of the 1850-s – early 1860-s», already published by different scholarly publications. Well-known memoirs from the period, together with criticism by Gerzen, Chernyshevsky, and Druzhinin, constitute a new literary-historical context which enabled a mid-XIX-th century reassessment of the previous thirty years of Russian literary history

REVIEW FOR MONOGRAPH: BOLOTNOV AV THE VERBALIZATION OF THE CHAOS CONCEPT IN THE POETIC DISCOURSE OF THE SILVER AGE (ON THE MATERIAL OF CREATIVITY MI TSVETAEVA, MA VOLOSHIN, OE MANDELSHTAM). TOMSK, 2010

The article discusses the critical responses of N. Ya. Abramovich devoted to the work of the brightest representative of the Russian female poetry of the 19–20th centuries, M. A. Lokhvitskaya. Deep and extraordinary assessments of the critic seem to be a significant milestone in the comprehension of her lyrics, and play a significant role in determining the place of the poetess in the literary space of the era.